consequences of bringing people from unstable countries into the Christian West

Multiculturalism in the West has come under fire for failing to resolve the escalating hostilities between native Americans and recent immigrants.

Although accepting multiculturalism in the West is sometimes associated with racism, this is not the case. The effects of importing individuals from unstable nations into the West should worry us, as these individuals might harbour disdain for their values and way of life.

The importation of tribal ideologies that exacerbate tensions between minorities poses the biggest threat to Britain’s multiethnic democracy. The riots in Birmingham in 2005, the disturbances in Leicester in 2015, and the recent racial tensions in the Peckham district are examples of this. Moreover, there is a risk that native Britons will become resentful of unfair treatment.

The absence of integration expectations stems from multiculturalism, and the UK has been particularly welcoming, passing laws, offering documentation in several languages, and funding organisations that discriminate against Native Americans. These accommodations are still misused by xenophobes and racists, though.

Not every culture is the same and needs to be accepted. Societies that respect women as equal members of the human race are superior to those that do not. Societies that uphold free speech are better equipped to grow and maintain internal harmony.

In the end, multiculturalism is bound to fail because it denies the basic need for a core moral and cultural norm that serves as a unifying force for society. Mutual respect and trust cannot be developed in society in the absence of a shared and reliable cultural framework. The primary shift that has occurred in the West since the 1960s is that the people have moved away from the things that once united them, like social background, politics, and religion.